2005 Mustang V6 in ITR will it work?
- Thread starter Ron
- Start date
Yeh, I was wondering about that. It has a better rear suspension by far, with a greater chance of making the intended weight (assuming that the classification formula works). The specs I found for it show real, forged (not cracked) connecting rods, and also, a 7.5in rear with a 3.31. I think that is the wrong gear, but we'll see.
Might be interesting! I rfented a '05 V6, and I was VERY impressed with the whole car, including the engine. If I was in the market at the time, I'd buy one in a heart beat!! Drove it up the coast highway in California, to Oregon. What a ball it was.
I'm too committed to the '02 to think of switching now. To many parts already purchased....
Actually, the 3.9 is not legal for us. It was only offered in the '04.
Bill
Might be interesting! I rfented a '05 V6, and I was VERY impressed with the whole car, including the engine. If I was in the market at the time, I'd buy one in a heart beat!! Drove it up the coast highway in California, to Oregon. What a ball it was.
I'm too committed to the '02 to think of switching now. To many parts already purchased....
Actually, the 3.9 is not legal for us. It was only offered in the '04.
Bill
Ron Earp
Administrator
Wrote a letter about that some months ago. Not sure what happened to it. No matter, the hp/tq are the same, so I can't imagine that it'd end up on different lines although it might land you in hot water at the ARRC.
R
JoshS
New member
I looked it up Ron, you had two letters this year regarding V6 Mustangs. The first one, #421, asked us to class the '03-'04 Mustang V6, and that was published in the February Fastrack. The 3.9 is not listed. If we should do that, please write a letter.
Your second letter, regarding the '05 car, was addressed at our July meeting and the results were just published in the September Fastrack this week.
Andy Bettencourt
Super Moderator
I would think that if you were going to build a car for ITR that had struts and a solid axle, it would have to make more than process hp to be competitive in that crowd.
Russ Myers
New member
yes, but it's a 3000# tank. nobody will want to get close to you for fear. Hell, even SM's and SRF's will stay away from you.
Russ
Russ
Andy Bettencourt
Super Moderator
Ahhh, but 17 cars in ITR are 3000lbs+ !!!
Russ Myers
New member
and they told me they didn't want the Datsun 280Z in EP because it was too heavy
Russ
Russ
RedMisted
New member
Sounds like we need ITX - IT Extreme...
Hold on, it's coming... Where, in a few year's time, do we suppose they're gonna put all the 300+ HP V6 Mustangs and Camaros that are currently being manufactured?
Ron
New member
i have been running the fox body in ITB for years and it has been great fun (CHEAP) and we have been very quick on certain tracks. I drove an ITS RX7 at Roebling in July and really liked the added speed. The thing that my friends don't get is that I really am a BMW person. I have a 1974 3.0 cs and a 1990 M3. The American Iron is cheap to run, after market support is great and if you ball one up, just find another shell and go at it.
This V-6 ITR car looks fun, if it can make the power. I am sure I could get it to handle, well, ok at least. I just don't know anything about the motor. Might have to look into it.
This V-6 ITR car looks fun, if it can make the power. I am sure I could get it to handle, well, ok at least. I just don't know anything about the motor. Might have to look into it.
Andy Bettencourt
Super Moderator
RedMisted
New member
I'm about the only person in the galaxy currently racing one of these cars. It's a '99, so no, I don't have the upgraded suspension and extra bit of power of the '05. But I do have plenty of cheap boneyards parts to pick from.
As for the 3.8 motor, the SN95 car can be built to go very fast, esp. at wide open speed cathedrals like VIR and the NASCAR circuit at Watkins Glen. Class-beating fast? That remains to be seen. But if you're looking for relatively dirt cheap speed, you can't go wrong with the SN95 V6...
Last edited:
Ron
New member
The "new " mustang does have a much better suspension. I was talking with a couple of Grand Am teams about getting them to turn and they had nice things to say about the car. No it does not handle like the BMWs but they do ok. That is why I question the power. My Mustang does ok in the handling department, however, we win the power match.
JLawton
New member
mossaidis
New member
Hold on, it's coming... Where, in a few year's time, do we suppose they're gonna put all the 300+ HP V6 Mustangs and Camaros that are currently being manufactured?
or T2 cars or T1...
IT rocks.And why the hell do we need to wait 4 years to class cars again? Cause IT needs to be cheap? LOL! right....
why haven't we classed the older Nissan 350Z or even newer 370Z classed? I see no reason why hell the new Civic Si or Solace still not classed. Why should the guys in SS have all the fun?
Hell, IT provides more fun and cheaper ways to enjoy potentially FASTER newer cars and still be competitive where applicable (i.e. new Ford Fiesta or Honda Fit into IT
. IT has soooo much potential - "better" than WSC or KONI challenge (yeah I said it - KONI!) I say.
mossaidis
New member
Why not? I certainly can think of a few reasons.... who the hell "sponsored" the article (i.e. bias)? where tires choices the same? were alignment settings optimized along with tire pressures? same track conditions through out the day? how many laps did it take get the fastest times for each cars? Were they those the fastest times?
Or did I miss your point and you're saying that the video does NOT apply to this thread?
Mickey