Yes, that will exclude your car...you are going to find that IT cars are classed as they come from the factory.Originally posted by raffaelli@Dec 25 2005, 04:36 PM
I am shopping for a 89-91 CRX which I am going to convert to a track car. I know it is more money to build the car rather than buy one built, but I want to do it myself.
I am looking at a car that has the B18 engine in it. Does that exclude it from IT?
[snapback]69180[/snapback]
Originally posted by Knestis@Dec 26 2005, 02:12 AM
http://www.it2.evaluand.com/recipe.php
K
[snapback]69184[/snapback]
Originally posted by Gregg@Dec 25 2005, 10:25 PM
Yes, that will exclude your car...you are going to find that IT cars are classed as they come from the factory.
Before you buy & start building, I strongly suggest that you download and read the rules and car classifications.
The GCR (General Competition Rules)
http://www.scca.org/_FileLibrary/File/GCR2006.pdf
[snapback]69182[/snapback]
Originally posted by Catch22@Dec 26 2005, 01:06 AM
There are two "dumbest" things a future racer can do...
1. Go racing.
2. Build a car and then try to find a class for it.
The rulebook is at scca.com. Read it 5 times before you buy or build anything. Not even a wheel or tire.
[snapback]69183[/snapback]
Fair enough...Originally posted by raffaelli@Dec 26 2005, 12:12 PM
I have heard so many conflicting stories about which engines were 'options' at that time.
[snapback]69210[/snapback]
Originally posted by Gregg@Dec 26 2005, 06:01 PM
Fair enough...
If it helps, I can assure you that no B-series motor was ever sold from the factory in the US in a CRX or Civic prior to 1992.
CRX Si: D16A6
CRX (DX): D15B2
CRX HF: D15B6
http://www.crxsi.com/specs.htm (Note that the "DOHC" and "VTEC" were never sold in the US)
The first two are ITA cars though hopefully the CRX (DX) will someday be moved to ITB where it belongs. The HF is currently classified as an ITB car though it probably belongs in ITC (or lower).
Good luck with your build. As someone who also built from the ground up I can assure you that it's a great learning experience. Would I have been far less broke w/ a comparable car if I had just bought instead of building? Absolutely.
[snapback]69217[/snapback]
If it was then we need to submit an O&A...It's listed in the '06 GCR under ITB (ITCS - 35).Originally posted by Catch22@Dec 26 2005, 03:40 PM
The HF was moved to ITC last year.
If someone can figure out how to make power with that 8 valve... Watch out.
[snapback]69219[/snapback]
Nope. I just love how the latest version of Acrobat will do a text search against all PDF's in a folder for ya. Only CRX/IT-related stuff found was the 1st gen Si / Civic Si move to ITB and your rejected requests to move the EF CRX std. / Civic DX to ITB.Originally posted by Catch22@Dec 26 2005, 08:12 PM
I'm pretty sure it was in a fastrack last year.
[snapback]69231[/snapback]
Since they are still classed in ITA you will be at an extreme disadvantage. These throttle body-injected cars make about 15hp less than the Si's from the factory (at about the same weight) and there is precious little that you can do to get more out of them vs. other platforms (like the Si). They might make decent cars for ITB if they ever get classed there.Originally posted by raffaelli@Dec 26 2005, 08:57 PM
How does a 95 DX hatch stack up or a 91 DX? DX not have enough power?
[snapback]69234[/snapback]
Originally posted by Gregg@Dec 27 2005, 02:34 AM
Since they are still classed in ITA you will be at an extreme disadvantage. These throttle body-injected cars make about 15hp less than the Si's from the factory (at about the same weight) and there is precious little that you can do to get more out of them vs. other platforms (like the Si). They might make decent cars for ITB if they ever get classed there.
I wouldn't recommend building until they are out of ITA. As Catch22 will tell you, though, the Civic Std (same as the DX but with a 4-spd) make for a pretty decent ITC car.
[snapback]69241[/snapback]