That isn't a flaw in my arguement - I never even commented on the general amounts of money being spent. I am arguing that picking on the E36 and adjusting the weights as outlined in the new system makes no sense what-so-ever. Racers are spending big amounts across all of the marques - my question is why is the focus suddenly directed at the E36.
But to address your points (I am not being arguementative here - I think this is a good discussion):
-World Challenge DATA is mostly worthless in IT - different rules, tires, etc - this is the secret stuff that no one shares. WC DEVELOPMENT is worth something. Call me about a header for your E36 ITS car and I will sell you the one we just updated for our WC cars and it will be worth 10Hp over every other system out. My statement only refered to parts availability.
-Number of times I have rented out the track for a day - 0. We are organized and come into test day with specific goals in mind and work all day with the car to get it where it needs to be - big changes if required, not just driving around to get used to the track. It doesn't always take money, just getting out and working hard (it is work on test day). I didn't get my setup right for the RA WC race last weekend and the car wasn't much better than mid-pack. I am not going to complain about the guys that did get it right.
-INTENT - the most overused word in any arguement and most misused word in any rulebook. If there is an intent to the rules, flesh them out to mirror that intent and have someone used to pushing them go through a revision and point out flaws. Racers push the rules to the absolute limit - the ones that are spelled out line by line. I don't go back and re-read the class objectives after I have figured out something that is legally allowed to make sure it follows intent. I think it is fair to assume that the intent is mirrored in the wording of the rules by someone more in charge of interpreting the rules than I am. Besides, how can you limit the rules to stop people from spending money? SS cars can spend as much as we do on the national level, as can Spec Miata in 1-2 cases. This is a fact of racing.
-The ARRC - unfortunately (?), it applies to most of us. It is regional, but the biggest regional in the country with the widest draw, showcasing a large number of the best cars and drivers in the country. The results here are a fair indicator of how things are matched in the spec pages because every car at the front will be well built, well set-up, and well driven. If you are talking about specific car spec problems (which we initially were), this is a good one to pay attention to.
CA racers are starting to go to spec classes as a backlash against IT rules creep. I have been working on a Spec E30 class for BMW racers which should begin next year. Not fast enough - we just speced out a few E36 cars that can be built for $12k including car and cage but no labor - build a spec class around these.
You won't get any arguement from met that IT is far from where it started, but I think that SCCA didn't do an effective job of limiting the rules initially and now, for better or worse, this is the culture ingrained in the class. What would I do differently? I don't know because I like the parts allowed and it is impossible to limit preparation money unless there was a claimer rule (try implementing that one at this point).
My counterpoint in two sentences:
Car classifications and rules changes, when made, should be made across the board, not directly targeted toward a particular person or group that is legally working within the current rule structure and status quo of the class. Remember, we didn't even race IT until SS was selling $35k cars - I just wanted to see a BMW win.
------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
James Clay
http://www.bimmerworld.com
Engineered BMW Performance
World Challenge/SCCA/BMWCCA Racecar Rental
Genuine OEM and Used BMW Parts
(540) 639-9648
-----------------------------------------------------------