Originally posted by Hotshoe:
Jake:
My first race that I ran was over five years ago and I only turned a 1:48.181 . Which I feel like I left about 1.5 on the table.
I do not understand why Road Atlanta has to set the mark.
.... Sure any one can fly for one lap but, can they do it for the whole race? That is where I usually capitalize on my cars performance.
Sorry to hijack the thread, but it's all over the place anyway...
If your 48.2 was under the current configuration, it is a very respectable time. (under the IT7 pole time the ARRCs last year)
If you could go even a second faster, you would have been under the fast race laps by a half second.
Why Road Atlanta? Well, I knew you were close to there, and its the best we can do for common ground. A lot of known fast guys run there, so it has some value as a comparison tool.
Relative to the ITA cars, you would be, at your projected fast time, about 3 seconds a lap off the pace, and they did indeed run that pace for the entire race.
And the fast ITS guys were 3 more seconds ahead of that.....
What I'm getting at is the analysis of race results is very important.
There was a thread in the "specific models" section, where a guy wth an MR2 had decided he needed to do a little work on his car as he wasn't winning consistently...some seconds and thirds were creeping into his results! A few posts later we learn that hes racing against average fields of 3-4 guys! A trip up north will have him running 15th if he's lucky! (very lucky!)
So, it's all about comparing well driven cars on equal turf as much as possible.
------------------
Jake Gulick
CarriageHouse Motorsports
ITA 57 RX-7
New England Region
[email protected]