We will release our testing data at around the PRI in a format that does not negatively reflect other manufactures data, as we connot make the comparison as we do not know without doing the tests ourselves that we are actually comparing the same apples and apples
When i say it is close that is exactly what i mean in context with what has been said below.
Although all the products have been tested to SFI38.1 protocols, the setup of each device can bring in variation that would account for the difference between our performacne and theirs. In the simplist terms, did each manufacture set their device up which closest represents the way a user would use the device under racing conditons. If not you as a racer could not expect the same performance out of the device when you used it and us as the the manufacturer could not expect to directly compare ours to their results.
If i am still not making sense then it would be the same as dyno testing your civic vs the M3 on two different days at two different dyno's. You still get the power and torque printouts for your cars but can they ever be compared when their performance is close enough that a varition in test setup, equipment calibration or atmospheric conditons could account for this variation and make yours better than his or his better than yours?
You have seen the other manufactures test figures so ours are within the margin of variation, which side, you will find out when we release them and be able to draw your own conclusions.
Regards,
defNder tech