Originally posted by C. Ludwig@Sep 28 2005, 12:55 PM
Anyone know when the SN05 helmets will be available? Or are they already?
[snapback]61362[/snapback]
Originally posted by lateapex911@Sep 28 2005, 09:27 PM
There was a GREAT article in a motorcycle magazine about the relationship of the helmets rating, and it's actual effectiveness in an impact.
The net net on it was that you might want to think seriously about what the statistical liklihood of your potential crashes is, and buy accordingly.
I will try to locate it. I can scan it if anyone is interested. If I had read this before I bought, I might have done things differently.
Found it. it is Motorcyclist, June 05.
I wonder if Baker has read this and what he thinks.....
[snapback]61404[/snapback]
Negative.Originally posted by lateapex911@Sep 28 2005, 09:27 PM
...I wonder if Baker has read this and what he thinks.....
[snapback]61404[/snapback]
Originally posted by C. Ludwig@Sep 29 2005, 02:08 AM
Since I won't bother to find the article and read it can you fill me in on your take?
[snapback]61416[/snapback]
Originally posted by JamesB@Sep 29 2005, 11:40 AM
Ewww 10 years of funk? im amazed it doesnt drive the car for you!!!
[snapback]61451[/snapback]
Originally posted by Z3_GoCar@Sep 29 2005, 03:59 PM
I've read it and the Synopsis is....
Increasing energy requirements make the helmts stiffer than they really need to be resulting in higher gee loadings. Their example a dot certified helmet might deliver an average of 198 while a hard Snell 00 fiberglass might be up around 235 average. The main arguement is that Snell should also work on reducing gee loadings in addition to higher energy. I think the 05 rating is done for two hits that would pass the 00 rating. Fancy fiberglass helmets that claim delamination as a way to reduce gee loads don't work. Also discussed was surviability of head trama and combined head and body trama with age related factors. A side point was that Snell has become a marketing tool and the periodic upgrades are simply to out mode the old equiptment.
James
ps. I'm in the market for a new helmet too, so I found this article :119:
[snapback]61456[/snapback]
Originally posted by AntonioGG@Sep 29 2005, 09:34 AM
Note that the M helmets are different from ours. .... So ours are designed for a single blunt impact. The M helmets are designed for multiple blunt impacts (like a curb). One other thing to do is to get the good rollcage padding, the hard BSR stuff, not the soft pipe covering that most people use.
[snapback]61459[/snapback]
Originally posted by mgyip@Sep 29 2005, 12:05 PM
I'm thinking about keeping it in the car so that it'll repel the mice...at least I'm not as bad as a certain former CRX driver who works for a local fabricator. He came into our shop to purchase a new helmet this year. Since he was purchasing an SA00 with the SA05 just around the corner, I had to ask "Why?". He was a bit coy about his response up to the point that his cat had been using it as a litterbox over the winter
:119: :119:
I have a cat myself but would have had to use restraint to keep from making Kung Pao Kitty out of him had that happened.
Out of curiosity, what does cat pee do to a Snell rating?
[snapback]61457[/snapback]
I'm withdrawing my comments. The webmaster does allow commercial posts here if you are a paid advertiser. This was according to a paid advertiser.Originally posted by 1stGenBoy@Sep 29 2005, 12:53 PM
Commercial Posts are NOT acceptable here. Many of the members work for other racing retailers. This is the first friendly warning. Subsequent commercial posts will be delt with differently.
Feel free to check out our advertising rates if you'd like to communicate your services to the IT community.
- Edited by Webmaster
[snapback]61426[/snapback]
Originally posted by 1stGenBoy@Oct 4 2005, 09:52 AM
Kind of funny that when I post here on this forum for my company it gets deleted but when OG posts it stays up. Whats with that?
[snapback]61737[/snapback]