PCA Responses... Who's responded?

Speed Raycer

Speed Raycer

New member
A simple answer... no soapbox's, no opinions, no info other than YES, I responded (or an equivilant response
wink.gif
).

I can't believe that they've received only 20ish responses after getting 4 pages of argument over on the other thread! {edit #2} Even if the same 6 people are debating on the other thread, surely it's caused other people to write in! It prompted me to write.

{edit #1}Oh... Yes, I responded.

------------------
Scott
It's not what you build...
it's how you build it

PFMSigPic.jpg

www.pfmracing.com

[This message has been edited by Speed Raycer (edited October 21, 2003).]
 
YES, I responded


Take a look at the authors of the 4 pages. Granted there are maybe 14 total authors. But mainly it's the same 6 authors ongoing.
 
I responded (not in support of PCA plan as written) but my position has gone down in defeat, since 49,996 members voted "yes" by NOT writing to the Comp Board.

Kirk

(who is pretty much as pissed off as he has ever been about an SCCA rules issue)
 
Yep.

------------------
#59 SSC Neon
Yes, I know it's not an IT car... yet... :)
 
I responded and I responded positive on the plan so Kirk has to adjust his figures on the numbers of those not responding.

Joe


[This message has been edited by Joe Harlan (edited October 21, 2003).]
 
NO, I have NOT responded...

Does that make me a "YES" vote???
icon_nyah.gif


------------------
Darin E. Jordan
SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
Auburn, WA
ITS '97 240SX
240_OR_041203_thumb.jpg
 
hmmm... what part of "no soapbox's, no opinions, no other info" did we miss guys
wink.gif


This is just to see how many IT.com members actually responded to the request for info in Fastrack

Thanks and let's just keep this as a poll and not a debate. Plenty of other threads for that
biggrin.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top