Originally posted by Knestis:
The symbolic interactionist in me can't believe that the SCCA mouthpiece SportsCar would have published this month's article on PCAs, were they not a slam dunk at this point.
Kirk... you are overreacting...
The SportsCar article was suggested by the ITAC/CRB as an effort to better inform the members of what PCAs are. Additionally, it was hoped that it would help the BoD have a better understanding of what PCAs are, since they have likely not all been privy to all the talk/discussion that has occurred over the past year.
The article was written by a SC editor, and he treated it as he would any other story... definately from a "Journalist" point of view. Reading the advanced copy... I was a little disappointed in the manner in which the subject was treated... almost like an "investigative reporting" type article..., but overall, I thought it helped to clarify a bit of what the intent is.
At least now the whole of the SCCA membership will have a chance to see what is happening and respond. NOTHING is a slam dunk, because, as I've said here numerous times, the BoD has to approve almost EVERYTHING that we've recommended over the past year... That vote occurs in August, with a follow-up session in December.
You have to admit... NEVER before has a decision so big been put forth to the membership in such a complete way as this issue has. Anyone who isn't aware of what is going on is simply NOT interested and NOT paying attention...
------------------
Darin E. Jordan
SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
Renton, WA
ITS '97 240SX
