therooster
New member
According to ITCS 17.1.4.D.5.b.1.2"MacPherson strut equipeed cars may substitute struts and/or may use alternate inserts".
What is the consencous on what is allowed by "substitute strut". For example: the Audi Coupe GT uses a one peice strut housing and hub carrier. Could you replace this with a two peice unit, with one strut housing and a seperate hub carrier. Same bearings, hubs and brakes on both set ups.
Advantage would be easier hub changes and replacement of broken/damaged peices.
I know that this is not specifically allowed therefore....Just wondering how much is considered part of the "strut", especially since they specifically mention "and/or alternate inserts"
While I am at it. In '85 there was a midyear change in the hub/bolt pattern. I am assumeing that you can replace hubs with a 4X108 bolt pattern with ones from an earlier car that has a 4X100 pattern as they are listed on the same spec line.
Christopher M Aylward
[email protected]
What is the consencous on what is allowed by "substitute strut". For example: the Audi Coupe GT uses a one peice strut housing and hub carrier. Could you replace this with a two peice unit, with one strut housing and a seperate hub carrier. Same bearings, hubs and brakes on both set ups.
Advantage would be easier hub changes and replacement of broken/damaged peices.
I know that this is not specifically allowed therefore....Just wondering how much is considered part of the "strut", especially since they specifically mention "and/or alternate inserts"
While I am at it. In '85 there was a midyear change in the hub/bolt pattern. I am assumeing that you can replace hubs with a 4X108 bolt pattern with ones from an earlier car that has a 4X100 pattern as they are listed on the same spec line.
Christopher M Aylward
[email protected]