Well, you certainly didn't use anything that wasn't already there.... but as I interpreted the rules that were posted in the other thread (the marked pavement), you were off (pretty far over the line).
[/b]
What rules??? Please quote for the source, (Lime Rock Supps, for instance) as opposed to repeating a quote of someone posting. I would be interested in learning the actual definition of the situation.
I suspect you'll find, as the Stewards did when they examined the situation, that there isn't a specific rule that makes his actions any less legal than the Miata that he passed in his video.
That said, it's probably being discussed as we speak, LOL. If thats the case, how should a "rule" about it read???
No tires over the white line? (Will need to define the start/end section of the white line, or hundreds of cars will be sanctioned at dozens of other spots around the track)
No four tires over the white line?
No line that could result in the front of the car aiming at the flaggers? (yes, thats impossible, isn't it? That's my point)
Any line, but only if not sliding? (Define sliding?)
His video was interesting. We saw him swallow the Alfa and the Miata. Was he out of control? Dangerous? It looked to me like he was smoother and more planted than the Alfa, that's for sure.
I think we should just resolve that the issue isn't Tim, not the Corner Captain, nor the pavement. It's the placement of the flag station reletive to the new guardrail. Because of the new configuration, an incident that occurred last year could, this year, be identical in every respect but the outcome.
Our system worked....Tim drove, the flagger objected, the tower said (presumably) sorry, no Black Flag needed, the Corner Captain objected, requested a ruling with a protest, and the Stewards looked into it, and ruled. No foul.
If anything changes, the flag station should be moved back to open the "catchers mitt" that now exists.
We don't need more rules.