Writing enduro supps is a 'black art', like alchemy (turning lead into gold, etc.). I think this because I spent a lot of time writing enduro rules and supps in the past 5-6 years.
Race organizers need to think of every eventuality not covered by the GCR, then come up with a solution and turn that solution into a paragraph in the Supps. Not as easy as it sounds, kids.
Like Kirk, I don't like enduros with 'mandatory' stops. Pointless nonsense, IMO...but I don't get to decide that for other Regions, and not the point of this thread. Besides, I have a VW that I occasionally drag out for enduros that goes nearly 2:30 on fuel, so who the hell wants to stop ?!??!!
How do you make the situation that Team NRG encountered fair to all ? Easy. If you are going to have a mandatory stop, and there is a possibility that the race could be shortened, add one (or more) of several things to the Supps:
1. Cars that have not completed their required stop by the checkered flag will incur either a 'time' or 'lap penalty', equivalent to slightly more than the length of time for the stop. So...if it's a required '3 minute' stop, add 3:15, or two laps, or whatever, to their finishing time and adjust the finishing order accordingly. This solution keeps people from 'blowing off' their required stop, as the penalty is somewhat greater, timewise, than the time they saved by not stopping. It accomplishes what the organizers wanted, and offers an 'out' for the 'early checker' problem (not a great 'out'...but an 'out').
or
2. Require that cars make their required stop within a 'mandatory window' that fits inside the minimum conceiveable race length (2 hour enduro ? Require it within the first 70 minutes). Of course, some bonehead will then crash at the 60 minute mark and cause a black flag, then it'll snow and there will be a tornado and a meteor will strike T&S, and all those guys who've been waiting for the 65 minute mark will be screwed.
How you monitor that all cars have made their required stop is an entirely different issue, but there a number of solutions to that, too.
Nick - at this point, there is nothing you can do, unless you've already protested the results based on Supps language that we're not aware of. What you can do, proactively, is write to the sponsoring Region's Comp. Board and point out the problem, then offer solutions that can be included in the Supps for their next race.
Someday, I'm going to sit down and write my great opus: "John's Guide to Writing Enduro Supps". It won't be a strict guide, but rather one that says "if you want to do THIS, then you have to think of THESE eventualities and have a solution for THESE issues". Anybody want an autographed first edition ?
[This message has been edited by JohnRW (edited June 10, 2004).]