maybe this is a dead subject, but i will confirm what Kevin R. has said, and people should reject/disregard any thing else in this thread.
It is important for the ITAC and other to remember that the 88-91 Crx/civc SI/ex motor what one of, if no THE most under rated motors from the honda/acura factory.
While the DX motor in the 92-95 civic will probably produce a few more HP and Tq then the 96-00 civic DX, it is hard/impossible to say what the difference would be. FYI the 96-00 civic DX/cx have a throw back IM/TB like the 88-91 civic/crx DX, but it has MP.
IMO any thing, weight wise, for these cars below, 2200 in IT trim is REALLY REALLY being optimistic. I have a 93 honda civic for H4 (which has MUCH more liberal rules about weight removal) and it wasn't easy to get to the 2220lbs for minimum weight. In fact i have happy at the 2215lbs with an empty gas tank.
It is important for the ITAC and other to remember that the 88-91 Crx/civc SI/ex motor what one of, if no THE most under rated motors from the honda/acura factory.
While the DX motor in the 92-95 civic will probably produce a few more HP and Tq then the 96-00 civic DX, it is hard/impossible to say what the difference would be. FYI the 96-00 civic DX/cx have a throw back IM/TB like the 88-91 civic/crx DX, but it has MP.
IMO any thing, weight wise, for these cars below, 2200 in IT trim is REALLY REALLY being optimistic. I have a 93 honda civic for H4 (which has MUCH more liberal rules about weight removal) and it wasn't easy to get to the 2220lbs for minimum weight. In fact i have happy at the 2215lbs with an empty gas tank.