Tak-
To comment on your thoughts, but in reverse order.....
It sounds as though you are running the upper links. The story goes that the rear end, when lowered to the ride heights we run, goes into a binding situation. (This is a twofold issue, from what I understand ...the links and the watts link both contribute. The axle gets twisted as it gets lowered) Take a look sometime and you'll see that the upper and lower link follow different arcs. The upper links are effectively eliminated in certain scenarios, and the upper location is provided by a new third link, and is considered a traction control device under the ITCS rules. The smae rules allow any material (air, even) as a bushing, so while the upper links are retained, they are located with extrememly soft materials, which really means that they are just along for the ride.
The third link is designed to provide the proper geometry.
If you were talking about retaining the upper links, the free bushing rule would allow you to create a bushing that would allow you to alter the length and/or angle of the link, as long as the link was not modified in any way. I imagine you could do this with machined delrin/aluminum casettes, among other similar solutions.
To directly answer your question about the top links being considered traction devices, I don't believe so.
Also, can you describe your push? High speed? Low speed?, On throttle roll off? Mid corner? On throttle pick up? Corner exit?
------------------
Jake Gulick
CarriageHouse Motorsports
ITA 57 RX-7
New England Region
[email protected]