I would disagree. I read the rulebook, and try to use it whenever possible to determine definitions that are related, and use the words and their meanings to form my plan of action.
In a case like this, I would read the rulebook and the definitions, and make my mods. And I get DQ'ed at tech, because a tech official thinks that the "intent of the rule is bla bla bla, ...even though it says bling bling bling", then we have a larger problem that will most certainly get appealed most aggressively.
It is up to the rules writers to write effective and clear rules that result in conditions that meet their intent.
It is up to me to meet the letter of the rule, regardless of the writers intent.
If they do their job well, we won't have any tech officials deciding what is, and what isn't meeting intent.
In your case, it appears you were wronged by an over agressive rules interpreter.
------------------
Jake Gulick
CarriageHouse Motorsports
ITA 57 RX-7
New England Region
[email protected]
[This message has been edited by lateapex911 (edited June 26, 2005).]