Before I go any further, some of you need to lighten up a tad or two. Please do not be selective in your word reading. Below is from a previous post by me. < This is not refering to you Bill.
"Fun playing upsmanship & twisting things untill the poster (me) thinks he's correct."
Steve, was your last post funny?
Jake, everyone should read everything someone else says a couple times & then continue to question what they said or typed. Measure sevearl times, CUT once.
Gary, being that Colin started this thread I'll presume the red car shown is a Miata & yes the bumber cover is a fairly flimsy piece of molded plastic. Anyone doing any serious business with their horizontal element of their airdam/spoiler wouldn't connect the mounting rods to the flimsy material. We agree that the rods are prolly not attached to the fairly flimsy piece of molded plastic therefore they are attached to something by viewing the picture not within the air stream therefore ILLEGAL.
James, I agree with you about the physical shape of an airdam/spoiler that they may be in about any plane anyone desires to fab them.
James, let me below take another shot at my teasing technial sense of homor.
If in the picture of the red car within the first post IF the manufacture called the red attached piece below the intergrated bumper assembly a "bumper cover extension" them we would need to call the black part in same picture the airdam/spoiler correct. Also for my purpose of teasing argue we need to forget about Andy's NACA ducts mounted in a horizontal plane. Now with all that ^ said the black piece called an airdam/spoiler is not tall enough in the vertical plane to implement normal duct openings for cooling brakes, correct. If one is allowed by rule to implement normal brake duct openings (for fun call the opening 3 inch diameter) for cooling brakes in the airdam/spoiler then one would think that the vertical surface would need to be larger in dimension than the 3 inch diameter of the duct opening which the black piece is not therefore the black piece is ILLEGAL. Twisted & evil BUT if the manufacture called the red piece a bumper cover extension that little thin maybe 3/4 inch thick black piece would be found ILLEGAL even IF it was legally mounted.
