irondragon
New member
Seems to me that ITAC listens to requests for change, and then sends a decision on to CRB.
CRB's process is opaque and impenetrable. Their decisions are rendered and that's that. No further input from members wanted! And don't even try an e-mail.
Matt's reference to the HANS decision is right on target.
So what's going on? Who decided that SCCA was to be a top down dictatorship when it comes to members asking for explanations?
In a time of quick and easy communication, this situation is unjustified.
Seems similar to France in the late 1790's - and they had a real revolution.
Let's start bringing the tumbrils to the False Grid.
Bill Miskoe
CRB's process is opaque and impenetrable. Their decisions are rendered and that's that. No further input from members wanted! And don't even try an e-mail.
Matt's reference to the HANS decision is right on target.
So what's going on? Who decided that SCCA was to be a top down dictatorship when it comes to members asking for explanations?
In a time of quick and easy communication, this situation is unjustified.
Seems similar to France in the late 1790's - and they had a real revolution.
Let's start bringing the tumbrils to the False Grid.
Bill Miskoe