ITAC changes. Chairman resigns.

Dang, I must not rate. No letter from the BOD. I only expected "Thank you for your input, IT fine as is."
 
Ron Earp said:
Dang, I must not rate. No letter from the BOD. I only expected "Thank you for your input, IT fine as is."
Click to expand...

That is very possible Ron.:D
But seriously, there is no automated reply generated by sending letters to the BOD. While there is not a strict protocol letters are often acknowledged by the director in the area the letter writer is from if that can be determined. Since most directors got home late last night after 5 days of dawn to dusk meetings dealing with many issues I might cut them a little slack if you do not get a reply immediately.
Do not be mistaken, member letters are a very important part of the process.
 
dickita15 said:
I might cut them a little slack if you do not get a reply immediately.
Do not be mistaken, member letters are a very important part of the process.
Click to expand...

Oh, I'm not concerned. I figured it'd be a few weeks before hearing a statement from the CRB on the issue. Sounds like it might be a lot sooner than that though, and that is a good thing.
 
This whole issue did happen at the worst possible time in terms of getting a response so I hope anyone who is expecting one is patient.

I received emails and calls from BoD and CRB members when I stepped down. No hard feelings on either side I hope. Sometimes fresh volunteers are needed to keep things moving forward. I would love to remain part of the team but I also know that in order to affect change, sometimes you have to go all in.
 
Step 3 - Run the initial math to rough the car in question into a class, using fixed weight multipliers, ranging from 11.25 in ITR to 18.8 for ITC. The product got called the "base weight."
Click to expand...

So what was the fixed weight multiplier for the ITA cars? I really like the fact based process.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top