ITR - best option?

Hey James... Unless Vic is doing something new his TEC3 set-ups are plug and play wired thru a gutted/re-wired BMW/Bosch DME case...BUT...not CONTAINED within the case!

I ran one for a bit on a 12psi Vortech sc'd MCoupe (now NA)...I got very good results (400whp), and Vic surely knows his stuff...perhaps he could be talked into stuffing a DME...???

I can't remember...can the newer TEC3R be used with MAF/HFM...???

Vic Sias at Sias Tunning make a kit to stuff an Electromotive TEC III into the stock BMW case. The TEC III allows configurable sensors and actuators too, unlike my TEC II system which is limited to certain sensors and a custom wiring harness. Step up to the latest technology and pay the price for the ability to tune the system without going through Confoti's one size fits all shark injector routine that's avalible for the stock computer software download. OBDII is such a crock, it basically undose any mod's made on the engine to make more power. How would the carb/points guys like it if every time they rejet the carb and adjust the timing to make the power they can get, then it all gets undone automatically?? I say allow us to just s-can the whole OBDII system and replace it with anything that uses the stock air metering system. Simple fact OBDII doesn't belong on a race car.

James
[/b]
Click to expand...
 
I am pretty sure you will have no choice but to go Motec with any OBDII to get max power. I think you can get real close to max without Motec in a OBDI car, you may leave 5-10 hp on the table but you will not be very close with a OBDII car without it. WIth the e46 double vanos you will need a upper end ( read $$$$ ) Motec unit like the M600 to get the most out of it. You will also spend as much having someone put that unit inside the OEM box as you did on the unit ( stupid rule )not to mention programming and dyno cost. You could build a very fast 98% build e36 and have alot of fun without spending as much on your fuel injection box as you did on your tow rig. [/b]
Click to expand...



Fred, I agree with you on most of what you said," but the must go motec for the OBDII" I'm not so sure of. I know that you can buy software upgrades for the OBDII cars and all they have to do is plug into your oem system to upgrade your ECU. I don't know how much of a gain you can get but I'm sure Tunner or Bimmerworld would know.

dj
 
I think your point assumes that the 325 is maxed out power-wise with the new-found tire width. That is where I don't follow. You ever follow an light ITA car with the same size tires as you through some twisties?

I guess the only question is whether or not the E36 can FIT huge tires...just another reason why I think the E46 325 will be a GREAT choice.

Any way you slice it, BMW guys have a ton of REAL choices for ITR with the BS of engine restrictions.
[/b]
Click to expand...

245's are about as huge as you can get on an e36.


Interesting feedback, all - thanks! Backtracking a little, is there anything to choose among the e36 325s? I might actually follow my own best advice and shop ready-to-wear rather than custom tailored...

K
[/b]
Click to expand...

you recently missed the deal of the year....ed york/ted giovanis's 325 sedan enduro car. think it sold two months ago. they still have their two sprint e36's for sale (one coupe/one sedan)...just add a fuel cell!

for an enduro car, the sedan might be a slightly better choice. the back doors make it easy for crew to access the interior to fix stuff/ refill cool suit/ change radio batteries or help driver get buckled in. the coupe is definitely easier to get in and out of for the driver though in an emergency.
 
Kirk,

I was going to suggest that you look at York's car, if it was still available. Seems that it's not.

Any reason you're looking at a Bimmer for ITR? While they're probalby good cars, there are a couple others on the list that I think may be better. For an endurance car, it's hard to beat a 911.
 
For an endurance car, it's hard to beat a 911.
[/b]
Click to expand...

Agreed Bill, just not with the ruleset we have here in IT. As mentioned elsewhere the 3.0 CIS 911's will not see the % gains more current cars will. They may outlast all others if the race is long enough and you sure would not need a big budget for front tires!
 
Why would you need to add a fuel cell? Just wondering.
[/b]
Click to expand...

to carry more fuel than just the stock 16gal. fewer pitstops......i think ed york's car had two fuel cells totaling almost 30 gal.
 
Hey James... Unless Vic is doing something new his TEC3 set-ups are plug and play wired thru a gutted/re-wired BMW/Bosch DME case...BUT...not CONTAINED within the case!

I ran one for a bit on a 12psi Vortech sc'd MCoupe (now NA)...I got very good results (400whp), and Vic surely knows his stuff...perhaps he could be talked into stuffing a DME...???

I can't remember...can the newer TEC3R be used with MAF/HFM...???
[/b]
Click to expand...

I forget the wording is it case or housing? The computer sits within a plastic case along the left side bulkhead near where the battery cable comes through. I've got the stock case and you could stuff a TEC III in there. I'm sure the TEC III will handle a HFM as even my TEC II will work with one as long as a heated Ox sensor is used too. The TEC II is mounted under the coil pack so there's no way that'd fit either the spirit or the letter of case stuffing there, let alone hooking up the stock wiring harness as it uses euro style connectors, actually I've seen the same kind of connectors on terminal blocks for National Instruments Data AQuisition systems.

James
 
I forget the wording is it case or housing?[/b]
Click to expand...
IT rules: "Fuel injected cars may alter or replace the engine
management computer, or ECU, provided that all
modifications are done within the original OEM ECU
housing. Only the stock (unmodified) OEM ECU connection
to the wiring harness may be used. The allowance to
modify the ECU in no way permits the addition of wiring,
sensors, or piggybacked computers outside of the OEM
ECU housing. The stock (unmodified) wiring harness must
be used. The installation of a resistor is allowed between
the sensor and the OEM wiring harness. Adjustable fuel
pressure regulators are permitted."
 
to carry more fuel than just the stock 16gal. fewer pitstops......i think ed york's car had two fuel cells totaling almost 30 gal.
[/b]
Click to expand...



I didn't know you were allowed to have more fuel capacity than stock. Doesn't the enduro car have to be IT legal?
 
another thing to consider if you haven't already....is the 325's might not be as thirsty as the 328's. and the E46 325 might be more fuel effecient than the E36.
 
That's one of those enduro-specific questions that isn't universally addressed by supps and the GCR/ITCS.

K [/b]
Click to expand...



WHAT!!!!!!??????? Do I understand you correctly. Fuel capacities are not specifically addressed in the IT enduro rules? Don't all IT classes, enduro or not have to adhere to the written rules? If your car came with a 16 gal. OEM fuel tank, because your running an enduro you don't have to keep the fuel cell at 16 gal.? I guess I'm missing something here?

K, could you clarify this for me.

Thanks
 
The ITCS tells you where the fuel cell - if installed - must be but doesn't say anything about capacity.

The VIR supps say...

7. FUEL CELL CAPACITY: Fuel cell capacity
shall adhere to category specification and shall not
exceed a total fuel capacity of 25 gallons.

...but since there's no consistent rule set for the club enduros (they are all restricted regionals, on the SCCA side), different rules might well apply elsewhere.

K
 
could you clarify this for me.


[/b]
Click to expand...

Not kirk but i think its one of those things that if you dont get caught, you are not breaking the rules maybe??? Funny how so many odd things turn up when a car goes on sale, i always put chips in my showroom stock cars right before i sold them :lol: and i think every IT car ever sold had a short shifter in it?
 
There is no max fuel capacity stated in the ITCS, except in the spec lines. In the case of the BMW's, if the fuel cell is located in the trunk, it must not exceed the stock capacity. I suppose you could run a stock capacity cell in the trunk, as well as the stock tank though...

As already stated however, the supps for individual events often clear this up. Both of the former 24 events (Longest Day and Night) only allowed 10% over stock as I recall.

Grafton
 
There is no max fuel capacity stated in the ITCS, except in the spec lines. In the case of the BMW's, if the fuel cell is located in the trunk, it must not exceed the stock capacity. I suppose you could run a stock capacity cell in the trunk, as well as the stock tank though...

As already stated however, the supps for individual events often clear this up. Both of the former 24 events (Longest Day and Night) only allowed 10% over stock as I recall.

Grafton [/b]
Click to expand...



Seems to me they should allow you what ever the capacity of the OEM fuel tank is period!
 
GCR section 19 says more than one fuel cell is permitted (this may be superceded by the ITCS which says that "a" fuel cell is allowed. It also says that fuel cell may be of any capacity.

I thin Graton is right that most supps for long enduros have a "percentage over stock" allowance for cells. Otherwise, there would be guys out there with 100 gallons in their car......
 
My limited enduro experience is that 10% over stock is what's generally OK - I didn't run any enduros in my last ITS RX7 - it was a 22 gallon cell made of molded plastic - not legal for EP either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top