RSTPerformance
New member
I personally wouldnt change anything with the track....it's a challenge and a challenge is good. if we wanted easy we could drive on the highway. On the other hand what I have a problem with is what MOST of you are saying. The runoff areas....i am new to the SCCA and from the few times I'v been on track I loved how difficult it was in turns 3 and 11 particularly. Unfortunately never used the south chicaine but it looks like a challenge also. There were a couple times I ran the right sides off the outside of the bowl as I came out and the same for turn 11 and I never want to do it again. Along with a fense or wall of some sort after the bowl, pave the damn runoffs in 11 and out of the bowl. We actually shoudnt be so modest we put a LOT of cash into that track and the least they could do is care about us a little more instead of adding a foot of asphalt every year or two. But dont touch the track, it's hard and makes us drivers use our heads at all times....cant say that for LRP.
Dan
#4 ITS
[/b]
Dan-
I don't see a need to change the track racing surface in anyway, I just would like to see "safe" runoff areas when/if you or I (or any of our friends) make a mistake. I also would like to see the workers taken care of properly. The problem though that you speek of is that with fixing runoff areas it could add "racing surface" as it did at Lime Rock and at Watkins Glenn (2 recent examples within the last 2 years). Unfortunatly making things safer sometimes will change the track racing surface a bit. If you had been around a while you would know that turn 3 and turn 8 at NHIS has changed significantly making it safer but also a lot faster.
Raymond