November Fastrack

Andy...not trying to be a jerk here....but, what is the logic behind the approach. This has been on the table for a while and hasn't had any official ruling. Why wait till the last minute to stuff it into the GCR. It seems 'we've' got it all figured out, it's just the formality of the vote. I think the approach is less than user friendly, and the lack of an "official stamp" is certainly holding things up for many. I wonder if the MOTEC in a box rule of yore took this long [rhetorical]. I'm baffled...........


R [/b]
Click to expand...

Rob,

I really have no idea what the rub is. The vote on this slipped a con-call or two (there ARE other issues the CRB and BoD have to deal with) and we are now close to zero hour. What difference does it make if we are first or last to get into the GCR? None to me. The ITAC made it's recommendation and the CRB has as well. The BoD will pass it or stuff it. I believe they will move in synch with the CRB. I have talked with both Chairpeople on the issue.

This issue spent EXTRA time out for member comment so it has been slower than normal but isn't that ok given the issue at hand? Yes, the resultant time to implement an ECU solution may be shorter but I find no fault in the timeframe. Not for nuthin' but if it were shorter, there would be people bithing on how the SCCA back-doored it and the ITAC was pushing it's own agenda (insert black helicopter nonsense) and if it's longer then we get what you wrote.

Lose-lose. :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top