Originally posted by ITAMiata:
Matt and James, I really don't know how likely the 1.8 liter being reclassed into ITA truly is. I've seen noise about it through the year in the SCCA magazine, but it seems to get shelved each time. I was 80 pounds over minimum weight in my 1.6, so I can't imagine a 1.8 being listed more then 100 pounds over the 1.6, thus the power increase would more then offset the additional 20 pounds. However, since I really don't know if/when they will do this I think I'll probably go with another 1.6 and see if I can get it down closer to the 2205 minimum.
Originally posted by ITAMiata:
However, since I really don't know if/when they will do this I think I'll probably go with another 1.6 and see if I can get it down closer to the 2205 minimum.
Originally posted by ITAMiata:
no one will whine louder then me!!!
Hey Matt, did you catch any of Gregg and I flying through the air on your video?
<font face=\"Verdana, Arial\" size=\"2\">David, I don't recall ever seeing a 240 in ITS. How well do they do vs. the BMW's? </font>
Originally posted by GregAmy:
If I were building a new IT car today, it would be a 1984 Package C Miata without ABS and with hardtop. Early 1.8L, LSD, and lots of fancy equipment that can be removed and sold on eBay for about $1000 (ask me how I know...). Figure you can get it to about 2375# with a 185# driver and it would be a perfect fit into ITA. - GA
Originally posted by mgyip:
Note to self - provide Brad with anti-sieze and thread lube for Honda rack bolts...
Originally posted by rlearp:
And, if you don't like that build a TR8. A JH or TR8 are the perfect SCCA cars, they are easily worked on and that is what SCCA IT is about isn't it, working on cars?