Originally posted by Geo:
...Now, marginal cost is not quite the same thing because it does not account for the cost of setting up the operations (a very real cost). But, none the less, I would even wager that marginal cost is well over $100. Sure I'm not a materials engineer, but I have a long history in manufacturing cost accounting and I have significant experience in this subject.
I know you are a very skilled accountant George, so I will defer to you on the definitions. I took some accounting in grad school but made a point of staying away from all that cost stuff.
My perspective is more from that of managerial accounting as opposed to financial accounting, so I'm keeping it pretty simple. Considering a BE analysis, and backing out the overhead allocated to direct labor, the incremental cash needed to make a marginal unit will be materials, labor (w/o said allocations) and incidentals such as power to run machinery and perishable tooling.
I'm throwing out all fixed everything, including non-perishable tooling.
Let's say you're right at $200. The contribution margin drops from $7.2mil to $6.4mil.
I know! We should hammer out the details of this analysis over a couple brewskies at Bill's RV during the '05 ARRC.
<font face=\"Verdana, Arial\" size=\"2\">Let's not be too misleading here. That would be like saying an Isaac is a little aluminum, some dashpots and a few bolts. We both know that's not true either.</font>
Of course not. We had to import that special Kryptonite/Pixie-dust alloy from the planet Zorgon. Shipping was a killer.
------------------
Gregg Baker, P.E.
Isaac, LLC
http://www.isaacdirect.com
[This message has been edited by gsbaker (edited February 28, 2005).]