ShelbyRacer
New member
Note to self: don't park behind Dave in impound at the MARRS race this weekend...
Being a current mid-pack ITB car at Summit, I like the split-starts for ITS/ITB. When we didn't have them (and this also can be an issue during qualifying- but I can fix that), several ITS cars wound up back with us and it can get annoying. We still had an issue with an SSC car last year, but I guess it will always be something. At least with the SSC car, I theoretically have a fighting chance.
I have little issue with someone who is actually in a fight getting it the middle of my battle. My episode at MidOhio shows that I'll try to play nice and think my way through when I can (though perhaps those results are not preferred), and I'd like to get the same respect in return, no matter what start is used. This is much more an issue of education and communication than one of legislation. T'would be nice if we could get the Stewards to participate in that communication when necessary.
Hoping for a great weekend...
Being a current mid-pack ITB car at Summit, I like the split-starts for ITS/ITB. When we didn't have them (and this also can be an issue during qualifying- but I can fix that), several ITS cars wound up back with us and it can get annoying. We still had an issue with an SSC car last year, but I guess it will always be something. At least with the SSC car, I theoretically have a fighting chance.
I have little issue with someone who is actually in a fight getting it the middle of my battle. My episode at MidOhio shows that I'll try to play nice and think my way through when I can (though perhaps those results are not preferred), and I'd like to get the same respect in return, no matter what start is used. This is much more an issue of education and communication than one of legislation. T'would be nice if we could get the Stewards to participate in that communication when necessary.
Hoping for a great weekend...