Originally posted by Banzai240:
From what I can tell... SS isn't necessarily a good indicator of what should be competing with what... It appears to be a bit of a "car of the month" club...
Kinda like IT, huh Darin?
Andy,
"head work"??? I would hardly call port-matching "head work". Do I doubt that the motor would make good power? Not for a minute. Do I think the car belongs in ITA? Not for a minute. Just trying to get my hands around how these classing decisions are made.
Like I said, it's pretty hard to even begin to figure it out when you've got SS cars in different classes, ending up in the same IT class. What makes it even more confusing is when they 'flip' like that (SSB -> ITA, SSC -> ITS).
Which IT cars are allowed to run 17" wheels? As far as what I'd do, moving forward. Pretty much what I said above. 15x7 for everyone, or stock, if larger. Some additional weight could be factored in, at classification time, to compensate for larger, wider wheels.
And while brakes may not be an issue now, they could be, down the road. Especially if cars aren't allowed to run the stock diameter wheels.
And BTW, the Skyhawk/Monza are in ITA w/ a 3.8 V6.
George,
You still didn't comment about the ITA -> ITB moves. Do all those people now have to go buy 6" wheels? What about the people that didn't want the cars moved? They've now got to go spend money to buy new wheels for their cars.
I agree w/ Kirk, these kinds of topics should be at the heart of the strategic planning for the future of IT.