The fact that you don't consider NASA "pro" racing and that you make a distinct differentiation is indication of the problem.[/b]
If the problem is your lack of understanding, then I would agree. Have a look at
this page to see what my local NASA group thinks they are all about. That's not "Pro" racing at all. Heck, most of what they run isn't even racing, never mind "pro" racing.
You don't respect the drivers in the same way and that's a big issue for me and I think a lot of workers and officials feel the same way as you do. That's a problem IMHO.[/b]
Matt, Matt, Matt. What are we going to do. Because I didn't think of NASA as "Pro" racing, suddenly, you throw a few assumptions into the pot, toss in a couple off the wall conclusions, and spice the whole thing up with a leap of logic or two. Stir it about and you have soup. So, "Nasa isn't pro" equates to "Dave doesn't respect drivers." Astounding. All that throwing, tossing, and leaping, which you seem to keep doing at such a high rate, must keep you quite fit.
I respect drivers like Dick, Jake, TIm, Greg, and many others quite a bit. Yes, there are some drivers I have no respect for but they are the minority by far. Yes, there are officials I respect and as with drivers there are some officials I have no respect for. Respect isn't about being a "driver" or being an "official". Having the title of "Driver" or "Steward" does not demand respect. Nor should it.
All told, I probably respect a higher percentage of drivers than other groups of club racing participants, like officials or crew. Stewards, as a sub-set of officials, probably get the least. I'm sure that dickita15 would gladly confirm that.
I watched the greatest farce I've ever witnessed a few years back when at least ten workers LIED in their testimony to protect another worker's misdeeds and an official's need to go after a specific driver. The audacity to do such can only come from lack of respect for what we ("amateur" drivers) are and do. I read the reports and ten workers claimed a driver drove on a cold track, yet there were six cars behind him when he came in including two others that were called into black flag BEHIND him. Only the one driver was sanctioned. Please explain that. [/b]
Thanks for the eloquent proof of who lacks respect for whom. These topics, and the ones in other forums are replete with such proof. Thank you, really, thank you for providing oh so much proof.
As for
the event you allude to (Page 308, center column, bottom), it must have been some kind of conspiracy. Some vast underground conspiracy that the whole club execpt you knows all about. Maybe the Republicans are behind it. Or maybe Arlo Guthrie is behind it, and really wants everyone to sing a chorus of "Alice's Resturant". In harmony. With fealing.
I've changed my mind. The safeguards aren't worth it. Even in schools. Let the instructors take care of it. Workers are there for ONE thing. If they don't like it, walk away. But most do and it's why they're out there. It's why I did it. I NEVER would protest a driver, EVER if I weren't on track. But some think it makes them more a part of the action... peer level, important. That's ruining the club. It's becoming a status club not a racing club. I say change the protest rules.
[/b]
All because I don't think of NASA, an organization that seems to mostly run HPDE events, time trials, autocrosses, drifting, and other such events, as "Pro" racing? It is amazing. Simply amazing.
Also, ad hominem attacks so belittle your argument.
Since you appear to have such major issues with just about everything in how the club operates, then please feel free to not pay your dues for the next year. As someone recently said: "If [you] don't like it, walk away."