rage_racing
New member
okay thats what I wasnt sure of .. not sure what honda these came off of though!!!! anyone need a set of 14x6 honda rims lol
Originally posted by Jake:
No - because of SCCA's cruel Joke, you need to get rid of those 14's because they were not original equipment on your car. You need to find some little dinky 13" rims to race on.
Originally posted by Geo:
Keep writing to the CB. PLEASE.
We get regular requests to open this rule up. I am 100% behind this change, but am still having trouble convincing some in the ITAC that this rule is becoming a serious problem.......
Originally posted by Geo:
Keep writing to the CB... PLEASE...
We get regular requests to open this rule up. I am 100% behind this change, but am still having trouble convincing some in the ITAC that this rule is becoming a serious problem.
Originally posted by lateapex911:
Hey Geo.....any idea of the reasons behind the reluctance??
Originally posted by Knestis:
It strikes me that this will be a particularly timely issue if the performance compensation thing goes through: Any car moved from A to B will lose an inch of width so maybe the issue is addressed holistically and width being on the table for consideration as well...?
K
Originally posted by 2Many Z's:
For instance, if a 240Z driver were to be allowed 15 inch in ITS, then all he would truly need to do to run EP would be to change tires.
Originally posted by 2Many Z's:
... so I don't know if slicks are required in Production or not...
Originally posted by ITA_CRX:
What is the opinion for how this rule should be changed?
Is it just to allow larger diameter wheels or is it to allow you to change the diameter of the wheel?
Originally posted by ITA_CRX:
I'd think that some cars with 15/16s would like to run smaller rims.
Originally posted by Super Swift:
But… Free wheel size is huge "rule creep" and this whole topic is against class philosophy. Sorry Geo, but I feel modifications such as coilovers and spherical bearings are part of the class philosophy.